Watch As Activist Asserts Rights Against Constitutional Threats From Police – And Wins

Turner expressed that he was remaining silent and exercising his 5th Amendment right to remain silent. For amateurs, the temptation to “help” the police “just do their jobs” often gets them in trouble with the law. The Constitution is clear: simply because a police officer makes contact with a citizen does not obligate that person to speak to them. The commanding officer promised: “You will not be released until we identify you.”
The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsJust one more example of why there is no such thing as a “good” cop. They all lie. I had a taste of the same at the hands of one of Texas’ FFCs (Finest Fish Cops  aka Crappie Police). Check it out here:

By Jack Burns at Activist Post

Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps InstitutePhillip Turner has made a name for himself as a 1st Amendment activist. As TFTP has reported, Turner won a landmark decision at the U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) effectively securing the rights of all citizens in LA, MS, and TX to film police in the course of their normal duties. But some police departments, specifically Austin PD (Lamplight Village Substation), still don’t get it and continue not only to infringe on citizens’ rights but break the law in doing so.

Combat Shooter's HandbookIn a recent upload to his YouTube channel (video embedded below), Turner recorded himself sitting at a picnic table on public property outside Lamplight Village PD headquarters. Predictably, police officers soon arrived and began questioning the videographer and demanded he identify himself.

In customary fashion, Turner remained silent and refused to answer any of the officers’ questions. He knew they would ask for his ID and would likely illegally search him to obtain his identification. Therefore, he did not carry his driver’s license or wallet with him.

If I’m not doing anything wrong then there’s no reason for you to be here…Texas is not a stop and ID state Is it?

Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewTurner repeatedly asked for the police officers to cite the “penal code” which allowed them to stop and ID him. They refused to answer likely because they did not know the very law they were sworn to uphold. Turner said:

You know you’re violating my 4th Amendment rights…Texas is not a stop and ID state.

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1) The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3) Not having an ID and refusing to answer their questions seemed to infuriate the officers who insisted they knew the law better than he did and that “by any means necessary” they would ID him, search his name for outstanding warrants, and possibly arrest him or let him go.

A Handbook for Ranch Managers Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference ManualTurner repeatedly asked the officers if Texas was a “stop and ID” state. It’s not. He knew it wasn’t but he wanted to have their responses on video. One over-confidently incompetent officer (unidentified) ordered his fellow officers to handcuff him and place him in the car.

He quite confidently informed Turner that he had been a police officer a lot longer than Turner had been an activist. Unfortunately for the officers, they were dealing with a professional. Turner has uploaded several videos instructing citizens how to deal with police without cooperating with their procedures which often trap people into incriminating themselves.

Turner expressed that he was remaining silent and exercising his 5th Amendment right to remain silent. For amateurs, the temptation to “help” the police “just do their jobs” often gets them in trouble with the law. The Constitution is clear: simply because a police officer makes contact with a citizen does not obligate that person to speak to them. The commanding officer promised:

You will not be released until we identify you.

But he was wrong—they did release him. After not getting their way, officers Tripp and Smith were forced to release Turner, although they promised to file a “suspicious person” conducting “suspicious activity” whose name could only be identified as “John Doe.”

Is that not what most people want? Do they simply want to go on their way, free to exercise their liberties to walk where they wish, film what they wish, and not be interrupted by police officers who seem paranoid someone may be watching them do their jobs.

It’s called accountability. Police officers are accountable to the public and the citizens, and part of that accountability is not making contact with people who simply do not want to talk with them, nor harass, handcuff, and detain entirely innocent people who have committed no crime.

Once again, Phillip Turner has instructed citizens everywhere how to remain silent, be uncooperative, and be set free when officers do illegally detain them, place them in handcuffs, and threaten them with arrest. Unfortunately for the Austin PD, they were sued for their actions. Turner reportedly received a check in the amount of $5,500 for being illegally detained.

Turner does not do it for the money. It is about freedom, the 1st Amendment, and citizens’ rights to film in public. These 1st Amendment audits will not end until police are properly trained and respect not only citizens’ constitutional rights but also their rights not to be approached by police.

Jack Burns is an educator, journalist, investigative reporter, and advocate of natural medicine. This article first appeared at The Free Thought Project.


Check out our WebSite

Check out our e-Store

Combat Shooter's HandbookCombat Shooter’s Handbook. Call for a pizza, a cop, and an ambulance and see which one arrives first. So, who does that leave to protect you, your life, property and family? The one and only answer is: YOU This Handbook is intended to help you exercise that right and meet that responsibility. Available in both paperback and Kindle versions.

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Police State, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s