Video: Why Secession is the Only Peaceful Path Forward for the USA

Secession of the states (as states) would be wonderful simply because it would be a step in the right direction with the ultimate goal being secession right down to the level of the individual household. — jtl, 419

3 minutes

---

STAFF NEWS & ANALYSIS

By Joe Jarvis –  via thedailybell.com

 

 

Here we are forcing 320 million people to “get along.” But we’re not getting along. And we’re not going to get along. And we should just go our separate ways, and that will allow us to get along…

We’ll get along better when we go our separate ways. It will be more peaceful when we’re not at each other’s throats trying to force our agenda. That’s why we need secession.

And all we basically need for that is to make sure that the federal government doesn’t come in guns blazing and say, “Nope. You’re gonna fund us whether you like it or not.”

I hope that in this day and age if there was popular support, they wouldn’t be able to do that.

And there is something to suggest that they wouldn’t react violently…

In this video, I go into why the political climate would be better if states seceded. Competition between the states would give us real options to shop around for the best government. By voting with our feet, we could actually hold power over what kind of government we want… moving to a new state is easier than moving to a new country.

I give plenty of examples of the benefits of government competition, as well as when and where secession worked.

Let me know in the comments if you enjoyed hearing my thoughts in a video as opposed to the typical written article.

Articles referenced in the video:

How Secession from the Soviet Union Created Booming Economies and Innovative Government

Why These Five States Would Be Better Independent Countries

Who Needs Borderless Nations if you have Borderless People?

Forget Taxes: What if Estonia Made More Money Selling Services?

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

 

“Owning a handgun doesn’t make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician.” – Jeff Cooper Call for a pizza, a cop, and an ambulance and see which one arrives first. In Warren v. District of Columbia the court ruled, and the Supreme Court upheld, that “(T)he desire for condemnation cannot satisfy the need for a special relationship out of which a duty to specify persons arises.” Because the complaint did not allege a relationship “beyond that found in general police responses to crimes,” the court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim. The bottom line is that your local police are not legally obligated to protect you, the average citizen. In addition to the Warren case, there are hundreds of court rulings which state that cops are not legally responsible for protecting individual citizens. For example, see Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, The government can’t protect you as you saw on September 11, 2001 as well as during the Washington, DC… Read More