The operative phrase there is “traditionally at least.” Locking people up because someone thinks they might break the law is rapidly becoming the norm. Thanks largely to the UN-winnable “war on drugs.” (It can’t be won because it was never designed to be won–there is just too much pork in that there barrel.) — jtl, 419
Land & Livestock International, Inc.
…traditionally at least, in this country we prosecute people for what they do, not for what we think they might do.



Jonathan Hoffman: Special to the Arizona Daily Star
The following column is the opinion and analysis of the writer.
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey is very enthusiastic about enacting some type of “red flag” law. He was quoted in the Arizona Capitol Times as saying, “I think the STOP plan — the Severe Threat Order of Protection — is the crown jewel of our safe schools plan,” and, “It’s the one…
View original post 743 more words
I agree. I think they are trying to condition us to get used to the idea of guilty until proven innocent (if that ever even happens).
LikeLike
This is a topic that is near to my heart… Take care! Where are your
contfact details though?
LikeLike
What the fuck is a “contfact” detail? Would you care to offer examples and/or identify exactly what “confact” detail you think might be missing from the article?
Unlike libtards, we always start with an axiomatic (self-evident truth) premise and develop a conclusion with logic (you know, if a =b, and b = c then a = c). Hope that is no too deep for you. That is why arguing with libtards is a lot like clubbing baby seals- pretty easy work. Either their premise is not true or their logic is flawed (usually both). — jtl, 419
LikeLike